<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:31:04 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>bsbnyc.net :: blog</title><link>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:52:36 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Burritos, and Guacamole, and Bikram- O MY!</title><category>Food and Drink</category><category>PersonalFitness</category><category>Strategy</category><category>bikram yoga</category><category>burritoes</category><category>foursquare</category><category>foursquare</category><category>nextny</category><category>recommendations</category><category>yoga</category><dc:creator>Benjamin Bloom</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:14:39 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/2012/1/26/burritos-and-guacamole-and-bikram-o-my.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">388388:4226406:14740959</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Foursquare has a new video on their logged out Homepage which I have embedded below (HT <a href="http://aboutfoursquare.com/out-of-the-closet/">AboutFoursquare)</a>. The video promises that you can find great burrito places to enjoy with friends, and&nbsp; "Don't forget to work off that burrito by doing an hour of bikram yoga next door."</p>
<p>Challenge: think of something more gross than eating a big guac-filled burrito and then doing bikram yoga.&nbsp; I did a little <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=should+i+eat+before+bijram&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a#sclient=psy-ab&amp;hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;hs=Grm&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&amp;source=hp&amp;q=should+i+eat+a+burrito+before+bikram%3F&amp;pbx=1&amp;oq=should+i+eat+a+burrito+before+bikram%3F&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;gs_sm=e&amp;gs_upl=52188l55889l0l56141l11l11l0l0l0l4l189l1627l0.11l11l0&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.,cf.osb&amp;fp=9312a04a49d78786&amp;biw=1280&amp;bih=707">research on the subject</a> and even Hot Yoga of Delaware specifically <a href="http://hotyogadelaware.com/d_about.shtml">recommends</a> against:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">we recommend that you do not eat a big burrito right before class.  In  fact, you&rsquo;ll probably be better off with no large meals for 2-3 hours  prior to practice.</p>
<p>Here's the video:<br /><br /><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/35640651" width="400" height="225" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe></p>
<p>Are there, perhaps, other recommendations that would be better?&nbsp; How about a great boot camp class in the park and a post-workout smoothie?&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/35640651">Hi! I want to learn more about foursquare!</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/foursquarehq">foursquare</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-14740959.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Do Trade Shows Matter?</title><category>Blizzcon</category><category>CES</category><category>Call of Duty</category><category>Digital Strategy</category><category>Games</category><category>Internet of Things</category><category>Strategy</category><category>WOW</category><category>Warcraft</category><category>Web/Tech</category><category>innovation</category><category>marketing</category><category>sxsw</category><category>trade shows</category><dc:creator>Benjamin Bloom</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/2012/1/10/do-trade-shows-matter.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">388388:4226406:14521177</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Peter Kafka of all things D wrote <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2006/01/06/consumer-electronics-show_cx_pk_0106cesdiary.html">The Apple in The Room</a>&nbsp; in 2006 (also re-posted it this morning on Twitter), but with the rise of social media, it&rsquo;s become more and more true.&nbsp; Companies have an end around CES.&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #222222;">Some have lamented the <a href="http://www.siliconvalley.com/ci_19691989">departure of Microsoft from the show</a>.</span>&nbsp; &nbsp;If anything, Microsoft&rsquo;s departure as the anchor of CES shows its decline but also how far behind the curve MS really can be.</p>
<p><span style="color: #222222;">Since companies create their own media channels, they have much more flexibility about when and how they communicate product news- both big and small. An age of real time and more transparent corporate comms also means companies can publish and shape a message </span><span style="color: #222222;">all year long, at will.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #222222;">The article's points about the smart devices, really the Internet of Things trend, have&nbsp;changed&nbsp;the important players. Meaningful, differentiating innovation &ndash; the kinds of WOW I WANT THAT features consumers want &ndash; happen so frequently outside the pavilion or dates of the show. &nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #222222;">CES used to be an event for the&nbsp;journalists&nbsp;to carry the message to consumers. &nbsp;But now consumers don't need the journalists (not exclusively, anyway) to tell them what is cool this year. &nbsp;Also, &nbsp;important industry announcements are increasingly coming at places like <a href="http://disrupt.techcrunch.com/">TC Disrupt</a> and the <a href="http://conference.launch.is/">Launch&nbsp;</a>conference. So yes, CES failed to keep pace with the industry but I am not sure it had a chance against the tide.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #222222;">My experience at SXSW last year was very different from the previous year. &nbsp;In 2010, it felt like being at the center of the universe and the cusp of very important trends. &nbsp;At SXSW 2011, we saw more or less the continuation of the same trends, but the Interactive festival has gotten so crazy, so big, so commercial, I wonder if the big brand dollars that have flocked to the event have sapped it of some of the weirdness that made it great. &nbsp;</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #222222;">And trade shows have been replaced by Brand Shows: the biggest games like World of Warcraft and Call of Duty are now so large they have their <strong>own</strong> conferences. These events are media channels, concentrated pockets of support for the product, hungry for news. &nbsp;The attendees are motivated and they want to BUY STUFF. &nbsp;They are powerful message multipliers. &nbsp;The scale and style of these kids of gatherings will vary by brand but if you have that, why wait for CES?</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #222222;"><br /></span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-14521177.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>A great wide warzone full of nuclear brothers?</title><category>Current Affairs</category><category>Film</category><category>Telecom</category><category>andy garcia</category><category>movies</category><category>nextny</category><category>urban planning</category><category>y2k</category><dc:creator>Benjamin Bloom</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 16:36:55 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/2012/1/7/a-great-wide-warzone-full-of-nuclear-brothers.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">388388:4226406:14479876</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Watched&nbsp;<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114660/quotes">Things to Do in Denver When You're Dead</a>&nbsp;a 1995 classic, and was particulalry struck by this quote (which is more or less humourous in context) and its relevance to technology. By the year 2000...I don't know.\</p>
<p>Rather than a racially-polarized warzone, Urban america has had a more commerically driven fate, with a transformation that made it hip to live in Bushwick or in an industrial building converted to condos. &nbsp;in the last few years, with the impact of wireless communications and the destruction/revival of cities like Detroit, or the reinvestment in Downtown LA that has gentrified parts the "innner city"- all these cities represent technology consumption enabled by population density, rather than a warzone devoid of it.</p>
<blockquote>Baby Sinister: The fact of the matter is by the year 2000 every city will be black. Thanks to the fax, the modem, conference call, federal-f**king express, the beast will be able to conduct his business from his home in the white suburb leaving the city a great wide warzone full of nuclear brothers.</blockquote>
<blockquote>Rooster: That's what I'm saying man, the fax, modem, FTD...</blockquote>
<blockquote>Baby Sinister: What the f**k you talking about, FTD?  Rooster: You got to have flowers in the warzone, Baby.</blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-14479876.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Options Tax Treatment Reminds us of Broken Incentives</title><category>Current Affairs</category><category>Strategy</category><category>critiques</category><category>finace</category><category>finance</category><category>ideas</category><category>mel karmazin</category><category>nobody pays that</category><category>sirius XM</category><category>tax policy</category><dc:creator>Benjamin Bloom</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 18:03:36 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/2011/12/30/options-tax-treatment-reminds-us-of-broken-incentives.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">388388:4226406:14382811</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span >From today's "But NObody Pays That" post on tax treatment for corporattuibs and the wealthy, those who can afford to manage their income for strategic tax avoidance:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span >&ldquo;These options gave executives a highly leveraged bet that stock prices  would rebound from their 2008 and 2009 lows, and are now rewarding them  for rising tides rather than performance,&rdquo; said Robert J. Jackson Jr.,  an associate professor of law at Columbia who worked as an adviser to  the office that oversaw compensation of executives at companies  receiving federal bailout money. &ldquo;The tax code does nothing to ensure  that these rewards go only to executives who have created sustainable  long-term value.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p><span >Yes, a highly leveraged bet.&nbsp; Yes, paid off on the rise in stock prices&nbsp;  and yes rewarding execs who may or may nor have creted susainable long  term value.&nbsp; Thjose are all true.&nbsp; I think the article unfarily targets Mel Karmazin, whose tenure with the embattled SiriusXM represents management of significant risks.&nbsp; The mechanics of rising tides - which governemtns world-wide have been instrumental in rising -&nbsp; do lift all boats, and it is troubling that we need the tides to rise in order to have the appearance of investor confidence.&nbsp; As the markets freak out time and time again, what goal are we amanaging toward? Are we managing for value?&nbsp; For whom? </span></p>
<p><span >The (mis)alignment of US Tax policy, compensation incentives, and the martket should not be an indictment of Karmazin or others like him.&nbsp; The critique of the market and the way the  few are able to profit from its gyrations remains. But let's examine our need for the apprarance of stability and confidence, for the appearance of growth?&nbsp; Stroing products, made over the long term, producing customer value, are the way out, not the feckless consumption of lattes and Barbie dolls on credit.&nbsp; It's a sad and despareate fact that we all need the market to appear to rise-  and bailed out the global financial system to ensure it. </span></p>
<p><span >According to the Senate Joint Committee on Taxation there is $25 billion in revenue for the treasury at stake with these deductions - and the implicit subsidy from US Taxapayers to employers who use options for compensation is no fun at all. Balancing the budget probably won't happen a nickel here, a dime there - let's face it, $25 billion over 10 years is a drop in the bucket of trillions - but aligning the tax code in more productive ways could certainly help.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;">&nbsp;<a href="https://owa.yrbrands.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://nyti.ms/vx14m7" target="_blank">http://nyti.ms/vx14m7</a><br /> </span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-14382811.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Does Using HootSuite Kill Your EdgeRank?</title><category>Analytics</category><category>Digital Strategy</category><category>buddymedia</category><category>facebook</category><category>socialmedia</category><category>vitrue</category><dc:creator>Benjamin Bloom</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:17:29 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/2011/9/8/does-using-hootsuite-kill-your-edgerank.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">388388:4226406:12774467</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>There are so many myths about what fans like, but we're strarting to understand that what one person sees on Facebook or Twitter reallys isn't predictable- their graph will determine what they see, and Facebook now gives brands more headachess than ever for getting into the newsfeed. &nbsp;</p>
<p>A possible answer to this is the rising numebr of studies which use the facebook API, and largwe scale data collection, to break news about what may be happening to page content (with the implicit point that most of thye a brand's fans will engage via tyhe newsfeed rather than coming to the page).</p>
<p>Solid analytcis, have been published on this topic, such as <a href="http://mashable.com/2011/04/22/audis-facebook-bieber/">Facebook Engagement analysis from Visibli</a> or L2's <a href="http://l2thinktank.com/research/facebook-iq-2011/">Facebook IQ</a>. &nbsp;A new <a href="http://edgerankchecker.com/blog/2011/09/does-using-hootsuite-kill-your-edgerank/">study </a>by EdgeRank Checker -suggests that using Third-party applicationsto post to facebook results in the creation of content that gets lowerr engangent than native Facebooks posts.</p>
<p>There are a variety of reasons for pages to want a managed publishing solution, including regulatory, workflow, manpower, and moderation, in additon to those you'll also hear in the sales pitches from Buddy Media, Vitrue, Involver, and the others named below. &nbsp;</p>
<p>So what is the enterprise digital social strategist to do? &nbsp; Never, ever, take the top line conclusion from the vendor and appluy it to your bsuiness. &nbsp;Ask for data about your client specifically. &nbsp;Dig into which pages were used. &nbsp;</p>
<p>For example, there are so many tiny fan pages doing a terrible job with mediocre nontent, I bet the amouint of objects created by those pages dwarfs the major brand pages. &nbsp;We've all seen those pages. &nbsp;I'll be digging in, let's see what else EdgeRank can tell us.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 350px;" src="http://www.bsbnyc.net/storage/ERC_APIPost_Hootsuite_Infographic.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1315495650095" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-12774467.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Apple Finances Start-up Costs to Manufactire the Future</title><category>Apple</category><category>Science</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>Strategy</category><category>finance</category><category>iPhone</category><category>innovation</category><category>ipad</category><category>iphone</category><category>nextny</category><category>retina display</category><category>science</category><dc:creator>Benjamin Bloom</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 13:43:26 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/2011/7/5/apple-finances-start-up-costs-to-manufactire-the-future.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">388388:4226406:12010590</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Nice wrap up on SAI, from a Quora post about <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-supply-chain-2011-7">how apple uses its massive cash resources</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">When new component technologies (touchscreens, chips, LED displays) first come out, they are very expensive to produce, and building a factory that can produce them in mass quantities is even more expensive. Oftentimes, the upfront capital expenditure can be so huge and the margins are small enough (and shrink over time as the component is rapidly commoditized) that the companies who would build these factories cannot raise sufficient investment capital to cover the costs.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">...</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Apple is not just crushing its rivals through superiority in design, Steve Jobs's deep experience in hardware mass production (early Apple, NeXT) has been brought to bear in creating an unrivaled exclusive supply chain of advanced technology literally years ahead of anyone else on the planet. If it feels like new Apple products appear futuristic, it is because Apple really is sending back technology from the future.<span><br /></span></p>
<p><span>Reminds me of the Clarke's Third Law:</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span>Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. -[<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarke%27s_Three_Laws">Wikipedia</a>]</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-12010590.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Do Consumers want to Keep Ads?</title><category>Advertising</category><category>Brands</category><category>Digital Strategy</category><category>automotive</category><category>digital strategy</category><category>innovation</category><category>volvo</category><dc:creator>Benjamin Bloom</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:53:57 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/2011/3/4/do-consumers-want-to-keep-ads.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">388388:4226406:10672750</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I'm glad that brand sare on borad with the idea that there can be a "not right now" relationship with a consumer- many marketers may only care about their explicit conversion metrcis. &nbsp;That's encouraging. &nbsp;But our real task is this: identifying the entertainment and information consumers want, and instead of standing in the way, creating the opportuntuiy for dialogue about what they might need, on their schedule.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=146064&amp;nid=124386">AdKeeper Button Lets Viewers Keep, Share Ads 03/04/2011</a>:</p>
<blockquote>Volvo plans to become one of the first brands to launch an online display ad campaign with an AdKeeper button. Clicking on the "K" in the ad will allow consumers to keep the ad for future viewing when convenient, as well as share with others through social media sites like Facebook or Twitter, or email.</blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-10672750.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Every Business is Different, even if you're selling Unicorns</title><category>Digital Strategy</category><category>Social CRM</category><category>crm</category><category>dan zarella</category><category>followers</category><category>scrm</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator>Benjamin Bloom</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:24:03 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/2011/2/14/every-business-is-different-even-if-youre-selling-unicorns.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">388388:4226406:10475975</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">I enjoyed reading <a href="http://vimeo.com/16400941">Dan Zarella</a>'s post &ldquo;<a href="http://danzarrella.com/new-data-engage-in-the-conversation-may-not-actually-work.html">New Data: 'E</a><a href="http://danzarrella.com/new-data-engage-in-the-conversation-may-not-actually-work.html">ngage in the Conversation' May Not Actually Work</a>" &nbsp;very much. &nbsp; It made me think- would such a recommendation ever be enough to run an ongoing &nbsp;social media effort for YOUR business?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.bsbnyc.net/storage/post-images/highfive.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1297697203128" alt="" /></span></span>What ultimately makes "enagaging in the conversation" actually work is the ability to drive action from followers/fans. &nbsp;What are those actions? &nbsp;Why are they important to your brand or product?</p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="text-align: justify;">Communities are powerful, but <a href="http://vimeo.com/16400941">unicorns and rainbows are equally powerful myths among many in social media</a>. &nbsp;What separates great social crm is a firm understanding of the consumer, and what they need. &nbsp;</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">If you posted 100 tweets about the industry/your firm and then saved one sale with 10 @replies, that's only 10% reply percentage, whcih Zarella's charts imply is low. &nbsp;Is it? &nbsp;If it moves your business, you can't argue it's not working.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;"></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">Agreed, in my example we don't have any data about operational costs or incremental revenue, but every business is different, even if you're selling unicorns. &nbsp;Concentrate opn what your customers want, and track whether you're delivering it.</div>
<div></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-10475975.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Fascinating - Apple is the new IBM?</title><category>Apple</category><category>Digital Strategy</category><category>IBM</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>facebook</category><category>innovation</category><category>nextny</category><dc:creator>Benjamin Bloom</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 20:17:44 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/2011/1/13/fascinating-apple-is-the-new-ibm.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">388388:4226406:10027315</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>By painting Apple as a new untouchable in the CE industry, has Dave Morgan taken the&nbsp;liberty&nbsp;to show us that the consumer experience trumps just about&nbsp;everything&nbsp;else? &nbsp; After a decade of losing Apple vs. IBM comparisons (in which I, &nbsp;as a boy, defended Apple to the ends of the earth, aided by my weekly infusion of MacWEEK) can Apple have a further decade of dominance?&nbsp;Eerily&nbsp;familiar to descriptions of IBM in the 1960s or 70s.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=142870">Apple: The First Trillion-Dollar Company? 01/13/2011</a>:</p>
<blockquote>Apple is out-innovating and out-executing the entire market. No other company is delivering better consumer electronics products with better content and communications experiences to the market, and iterating them constantly, than Apple.? Not only that, but no one else is delivering consumer electronic products and related software and content at the scale, and with the degree of customer service, that Apple is today. Not Sony. Not Samsung. Not LG. Not Google. No one.</blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The business of video on demand was possible and&nbsp;eminently&nbsp;doable in 1994-95. &nbsp;Most of the cable companies buried their heads in the sand. &nbsp; IBM was content selling servers, having lost the DOS vs. Windows battle (or even OS2/Warp!) &nbsp;Yet we didn't see it for more than a decade in most US Cable households. &nbsp;</p>
<p>Great products and ideas die, all the time. &nbsp;I personally never owned a mac clone, but some of those machines were really insipiring piecves of machinery. &nbsp;Gil Amelio couldn;t save Apple, but Jobs did. &nbsp;He rebooted the company.</p>
<p>And that's why the powerhouse that Apple has become, can't last forever. &nbsp;What IBM has build doesn't rely on one person, ditto to GE, Comcast, Verizon. &nbsp;Apple has a lockup on the fringe, but it can't take the mass. &nbsp;The mass just won't tolerate it.</p>
<p>David Pogue suggests this&nbsp;morning&nbsp;that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/13/technology/personaltech/13pogue.html">CES was a sideshow of Apple copycats</a>. &nbsp;His money quote from an industry insider:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&ldquo;These companies are like 6-year-olds on a soccer team,&rdquo; one company representative told me. &ldquo;The ball goes over here, and they all run after it in a blob. &lsquo;Tablet!&rsquo; &lsquo;Tablet!&rsquo; &lsquo;Tablet!&rsquo;&nbsp;&rdquo;</p>
<p>The innovation, however, is moving to the cloud- the services on top of the devices. &nbsp;That will keep shiny, new things on our TVs for now. &nbsp;See InsideFacebook's <a title="Permanent Link to The Best Facebook-Integrated Devices from CES 2011" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2011/01/07/ces-2011-facebook-products/">The Best Facebook-Integrated Devices from CES 2011</a>.</p>
<p>But it can't last longer than Steve Jobs. &nbsp;Even as Steve keeps the fanboys cheering (and even some day clicking the "like" button) he hasn't build anything that can outlive him.</p>
<p>Well, maybe, just maybe, it's fixing the news business! (via <a href="http://www.fakesteve.net/2011/01/my-talk-with-a-left-wing-hack.html">Fake Steve Jobs</a>)</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The news business has descended into the gutter in a pathetic attempt to stay alive. It&rsquo;s been a horrible race to the bottom. This is turn has polluted our politics, and now we&rsquo;re seeing the result of it.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Fortunately for the world, we&rsquo;re going to change all that, with iPad and the apps model. But that&rsquo;s a story for another day.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-10027315.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Welcome Rachel!</title><category>Columbia</category><category>Rachel</category><category>admin</category><category>personal branding</category><dc:creator>Benjamin Bloom</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:02:01 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/2010/12/27/welcome-rachel.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">388388:4226406:9841266</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I'm sitting next to my fianc&eacute;e Rachel Rothman, on our couch, and she's just finished writing her <a href="http://rachelrothman.wordpress.com/2010/12/27/my-new-life/">first blog post</a>. A blog can be a helpful tool for personal branding during a transition period, and this was an important motivation for me to begin blogging in 2006.  I also know that The world, and the Columbia community, have much to learn from Rachel, and I hope her blog is a means for her to express her wisdom and identify new peers, as she transitions to the life of a full time graduate student at Teacher's College.</p>
<p>She'll be blogging her thoughts on nutrition, the food industry, diet and exercise, and the journey to her MS in nutrition education and RD certification, over at <a href="http://rachelrothman.wordpress.com">rachelrothman.wordpress.com</a>.</p>
<p>I encourage you to take a look and perhaps even leave a comment for her ;)</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.bsbnyc.net/blog/rss-comments-entry-9841266.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>
